Wednesday, 16 October 2013
For anyone who’s not familiar with it, this new series sees Mr Fry travelling the world trying to understand why so many people are threatened by two people of the same sex being together. In the programme he addresses the question. ‘Why are so many people obsessed about the biology of homosexual love making?’
There was one openly gay guy in the BNP. The leadership
just used this guy as a token “look were not homophobic we have a one in our
ranks” but behind his back it was ‘puff this’ or ‘faggot that’.
They can’t see that no one is promoting same sex. Teachers are just promoting tolerance. There not telling kids ‘hey. be gay, it’s great’ they are just telling kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay.
It’s embarrassing how thousands of men get so angry about this subject. What are they afraid of? This same theory argues that these very same men may join such sub-cultures as football or motorcycle gangs, indulge in violence and lots and lots [far too much] of male bonding?
Ahh well there’s the rub.
Wednesday, 9 October 2013
Yesterday while everyone was watching Robinson, Carroll and Quilliam. I was watching Nick Griffin.
Several times I have stated that Griffin is insanely jealous of the EDL. He craves to be that kind of figure head, leading an army of 'angry white men'.
Since the EDL formed he has bounced back and forward from ridiculing them and calling them 'Zionist puppets' to holding out the olive branch in the hope of a merger.
It costs nothing to be a member of the EDL; there is no membership. Thousands of angry men 'thinking' they are taking affirmative action against radical Islam and paying nobody for the privilege. Griffin has been spitting feathers since their inception and all the money he could have made.
I've already said that Griffin will emulate the EDL next year. At the moment he is an MEP. This will come to an end next June. With the office of MEP and being a political party he has to operate within legal, moral and ethical parameters. Next year he will no longer have this restriction. He has realised that as politics go he and his fringe party are finished.
Bring on phase 2.Back to the days of street protests.
When he first started out he was National front. He was actually largely responsible for taking the protesters of the streets and getting them involved in politics.
He thought he could gain power and influence that way. That's all been for nothing. His party is virtually gone.
I think he will go back to the old days of marching and trying to provoke this race war he spends hours dreaming off.
He genuinely believes that this war is coming and he will carried aloft by the downtrodden 'white people of Britain' to save them in their hour of need. Lunatic!
He has tried to organise some street demos but they have been quite pathetic in their numbers. Like-minded People have had the EDL to march behind and he's ended up being stood on the sidelines, watching, fuming and thinking what may have been.
Even after the evil murder of Lee Rigby, Griffin couldn't summon up more than a few people. He tried to get people up for a march [with him at the front of a motorcade saluting and waving to his legion of admirers] but to no avail. A couple of dozen acolytes ended up showing up as he laid a wreath.
In comparison the EDL had mass protests all over Britain!
So will the EDL stay as it is or will it fracture into regional units? I think Griffin would prefer it broke up. He has already forged alliances with such EDL factions as the 'North West infidels' and the 'English volunteer Force'. He will be hoping to do the same again with any newly formed extremist groups.
If the EDL does remain as a national protest group he will desperately try to forge alliances with the new leadership. Of course this all depends who and if, anyone takes over?
Ironically the one thing that stopped Griffin and Co getting their dirty hands on the EDL was Robinson and Carroll. They would have nothing to do with him. Well now they have gone and just watch this space.
Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll have left the EDL. SO’ what now?
I’m not privy to any information about the whys and
wherefore about how this happened [despite the timing of my post on Monday;
purely coincidental] but all I can say is ‘if they are genuine’ good luck to
them. They are working with the forward thinking ‘Quilliam foundation’ that
will mentor and guide them on another path. After all who better to guide someone away
from an extremist organisation than someone who were once themselves members of
I watched Robinson on ‘Newsnight’ and thought he came
over well. But’ I didn't like what he said about halting Muslim immigration.
That’s the last thing we should be doing. We need to continue welcoming refugees
and asylum seekers from anywhere, but we must insist that they leave their
cultural baggage where they fled from.
By this I mean archaic customs such as Sharia law, Forced
marriages, FGM and other such Stone Age practices, that we in the west 'should' find abhorrent.
We need to get past culture. It’s about acting as 21st
century human beings. The only question immigrants need to answer.
Do you want to live in a secular, free, equal and modern
So now it all depends what Tommy Robinson’s politics are
as in how he casts of his past?
If he joined Labour his past would be forgiven overnight.
EX BNP and NF members appear to have become extremely clean by supporting them? They can even write books about the violence they participated in
towards black and Asian people. But because they have adopted and embraced the post-modern
cultural apologist mantra of unrestricted multiculturalism
they are clean.
The left never expose ex far-right people in the ranks of
Labour, but will use them joining another party to attack it. After all Anti-fascist
organisations are strongly linked to the unions and the Labour party. That’s a fact.
Whilst in the BNP I saw how these organisations worked.
They undoubtedly do parties like the BNP harm but first and foremost they are
political. I've already mentioned that the Tories and liberals treat me [on the
whole] well. The bile and hate that comes from Labour and their political
partners has to be seen to be believed.
I still get some now just walking down the street by some
antifascist Muppet who doesn't know I quit, and I’m only know in my town. Robinson
and Carroll have national recognition.
The antifascists leaflet on behalf of the unions and Labour.
After all, its Labour votes that the BNP was taking, because it was the working
classes that had been let down by Labour. None of the other parties ever put
third part leaflets out against the BNP. They tended to take on the BNP
directly. The way it should be done.
The antifascists need an enemy. It was mentioned in the Quilliam press conference that Robinson may be setting up a new political party. If he is a threat to Labour votes he will find himself back under the antifascists radar, and if he even mentions immigration or any questions to do with Islam, again he will find himself back in the spotlight as a fascist.
There is nothing wrong with having these conversations
but we are, and need to be very cautious about who is having them and why?
That is not a veiled word of caution about Robinson. That
should apply to anyone. It’s not about the conversations and questions we
should be having. It’s about the agenda
Also’ Just a word on Griffin! I mentioned in the previous post
that Griffin loses his seat next year. No more money, very few members.
I said he would move more to the EDL strategy of street
protests. Well I think he may have been forced to move his grand plan forward
after Tommie’s resignation. He is falling over himself on all social media to
get as many EDL over to him as possible.
Some will no doubt go over to the BNP. But many will go
the same way as the BNP when it fractured a few years ago. Lots of little
wannabes setting up different groups, fighting each other for supremacy.
Monday, 7 October 2013
I know I said in a previous post that I would no longer be following the far right to see what they are up to; and I stand by that. I've stopped trawling the BNP sites for stories, as there just isn't any. Add to this the fact that they are virtually finished as a political entity. But’ this is just a generalisation and not a direct observation relating to one specific event.
The EDL pose a greater
threat to social cohesion than the BNP.
The BNP has a leader, it has a chairman. As inept and
useless as he is he has to try and play the PR game. They are a political party
and have to operate within certain legal parameters. Although the party is full
of racists and Nazis he has to keep them hidden; or at least try. He knows fine well that if a long steady stream of
pictures with shaven headed jackbooted thugs, giving dodgy skyward salutes and
sporting strange tattoos; his voter base will go down even further [which is
getting hard to comprehend as it’s virtually disappeared]
At the moment Griffin holds an office as MEP, which is almost
certain to evaporate at next year’s elections. I think when this happens he will
attempt to emulate the EDL and try to build a street movement similar to what they have. He is insanely jealous of their support. Even though their's has diminished, it still remains far
larger than the BNPs.
But for the moment he has to play the politics game. They cannot be seen to be stirring up racial tensions too much.
To use the BNP name you have to be a member, with this comes rules. So on the whole activity throughout the BNP is relatively uniform. If an ex-member or an outsider attempts to use the brand name BNP they will be sued.
Griffin owns brand BNP!
In the opposing corner we have the EDL. Stephen Lennon is not a leader; he’s more of a figure
head, a spokesperson. There is no membership. No enforceable code of conduct
and no fear of being kicked out or indeed sued for using the name EDL.
So unlike the BNP the EDL comprises of self-governing autonomous
groups. These could be groups consisting of genuine people who have a valid and
genuine concern regarding political and radical Islam. Or they could be groups
consisting of Nazi thugs or racist bigots. Who have seen this street movement as
a good excuse to blame Muslims and indeed all foreigners for all Britain’s
There are so many factions now it’s hard to keep track.
So’ when a large protest is organised with divisions
coming from all over the country it’s not surprising that there’s trouble. Many
times EDL factions fight among themselves, and I understand that Lennon
himself has attacked Nazis within the ranks. Throw into the mix the equally odious
UAF and it’s a question of lighting the taper and run like hell.
So do even the decent members [and there are bound to be some] of the EDL make the whole Islam question worse.
Yes’ there is no doubt they do.
If you live in a Muslim community [mind you there should
be no Muslim communities; just communities] and you see hundreds of white males
marching and chanting often fueled with alcohol what are you going to do?
You’re not going to take a step back and think ‘hold on do these guys have a point’ no you will be pushed farther into your community.Where the the radical preachers can then go to work on you. As you do this the wider community feels even more threatened and round and round it goes.
In my opinion if the EDL founders really want to make a difference and fight political Islam. Put down your beer and your flags, disband the EDL and take another course of action. I’m pretty sure someone with such a high profile as Stephen Lennon would perhaps be taken a bit more seriously if he did this.
It would also go a long way into defusing tensions in neighborhoods as well. And it would allow the police to put more time and effort into tackling Islamist terror cells.Take one extremist group off the streets, save the tax payers money and also take away some of the victim status the Islamists crave.
There are many legitimate groups taking on radical Islam and winning. Support these and really help make a difference!
Saturday, 5 October 2013
I wrote this a few weeks ago and seeing as how Mehdi Hasan has declared war on the daily mail, and they in return, on him; I thought this would be as good a time as any to put on my blog.
There is a mind-set that you have to be in one political camp or another. You have to be right or left wing. Most people are neither but in many cases the politicians, policy makers and people who have real influence on society are. Quite often the worst offenders are the political activists both online and in the real world.
If your right wing you have to have a go at ‘liberal democracy and ‘woolly minded liberals’ [Their words, not mine]
If your left wing you have to arrogantly look down your nose at anyone that doesn't believe in a bloated state and public sector.
This mind-set even tries to dictate which newspapers you should read.
If your right wing you have to despise the guardian and dismiss everything that’s in it as PC, Britain hating, claptrap, and that these people can’t get out of bed in the morning because of a lack of a backbone.
Likewise if your left wing you have to sneer constantly at anyone that reads the daily mail. Dismissing them all as nutters, racists and closet Nazis!
Well here’s a question. What if you read both papers online [and many others]several times a week [I wouldn't buy them because I don’t want to help them peddle some of their rubbish, plus I quite often have to Google a DM story to see if its true, recent or even relevant]
So does what I read make me a lefty, pc, woolly liberal, Britain hating, patriotic Nazi, racist, bigot?
Wow what would one of them look like?
For some reason to be a ‘socially conscious nice human being’ you have to attack papers such as the DM as often as possible. If you don’t well obviously you’re a right wing nut-job.
Similarly the Guardian; according to the right wing ‘Is read by lentil eating, humus smelling goat breeders who drive Citroen 2CVs and live in their own hair’.
So ‘my argument is this. How on earth can you get a realistic perspective on life if your information comes from one socio-political base?
No newspaper is totally bad. If you only ever read the daily mail ‘god help you’.
It must be hard to get out of your bed in the morning because of all the Muslim terrorists, African rapists and Romanian muggers hiding behind your bins. That’s assuming you have a bin because of all the unemployed scroungers and refugee’s that may have stolen it!
Likewise’ If you read nothing but the Guardian. Again ‘god help you’. You must believe that Britain is responsible for all the worlds’ ills and terrorists are just misunderstood freedom fighters and there’s a government conspiracy behind everything.
Sometimes the very reason a newspaper runs a story is to prop up its political bias. But if the story is true it doesn't matter who publishes it. It’s still true.