Nationalists and their obsession with homosexuality.

Just watched Stephen Fry’s “out there”

For anyone who’s not familiar with it, this new series sees Mr Fry travelling the world trying to understand why so many people are threatened by two people of the same sex being together. In the programme he addresses the question. ‘Why are so many people obsessed about the biology of homosexual love making?’
They seem to take it as a personal affront. Two people engaging in a sexual act that does not comply with their own view of sex.

We've all heard and met the odd homophobic nutter, but it was only in the BNP that I saw it on a regular basis.
Griffin, Jefferson, in fact-all of the hierarchy. They’re obsessed with it. Too hear them talk it’s as if two guys had come up to them raped them or made them watch. Some of them with even the mention of homosexuality would spin out of control and start emitting such sounds of disgust; it really has to be seen to be believed.

There was one openly gay guy in the BNP. The leadership just used this guy as a token “look were not homophobic we have a one in our ranks” but behind his back it was ‘puff this’ or ‘faggot that’.
And’ as usual the BNP have a conspiracy for everything; even homosexuality.
They don’t just say we don’t agree with homosexuals. There has to be a far darker reason why they deplore them so much.
 ….”The Marxists are behind it. They are trying to destroy the family by turning everyone gay”.
 “They are purposely putting chemicals in our food to turn us all into raving queens”.
And the best one.
‘They are doing this only to white people in an effort to stop us 'whities' breeding and therefore die out!. Even David Icke doesn't think his lizard men are that bad !
To these idiots-Civil-partnerships, gay marriage, adoption by a gay couples, gay pride. All of these are used to neuter the white male and let them damned dark skinned people out number us. Then when they do 'god help us' they will be coming for us!
You really couldn't make this shit up

To nationalists ‘as usual’ the biggest culprits are the teachers. They are promoting homosexuality to help this pre-fertilisation genocide of ‘our race’. I kid you not.

They can’t see that no one is promoting same sex. Teachers are just promoting tolerance. There not telling kids ‘hey. be gay, it’s great’ they are just telling kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay. 
Huge difference.

Russia, Uganda, most Muslim countries and nationalists are all terrified of homosexuals.
I agree with the theory that when a man exhibits such fierce homo phobic vitriol it’s because he’s so damned scared of his own feelings and thoughts he has to be the one who shouts the loudest in condemnation. 

It’s embarrassing how thousands of men get so angry about this subject. What are they afraid of?  This same theory argues that these very same men may join such sub-cultures as football or motorcycle gangs, indulge in violence and lots and lots [far too much] of male bonding?
Perhaps most would be happier to just come out.

A very senior official [before he joined the party] was known to have enjoyed [how shall we say] adult parties. At these parties it was [again, how do I put this] ……acceptable practice to grab hold of the next person to you [male or female] and ………….enjoy yourself!
Apparently this is common knowledge in the area where he lives.

This very same official constantly talks about gays ‘a lot’ and says such things as “I don’t give a shit what gays do but they should keep it to themselves, it’s not bloody natural”
Well as far as I know, they do keep it to themselves…unless of course you buy the DVDs Mr official.
And hey, if parties like that float your boat good luck to you, enjoy yourself; but don’t be a hypocrite.
 

So Griffin, Putin and all the other homophobic politicians, Muslim leaders and African Christians; come out of the closet and enjoy life.
My apologies to the gay community. You maybe don’t want these sexually inadequate men anyways.

As usual regular readers of this blog will know that I’m no fan of so called antifascist organisations either. Where are they when homophobic Imams and ‘dark’ skinned world leaders are espousing irrational hatred against homosexuals?  

Ahh well there’s the rub.
They only ever attack white bigots; white Christian bigots.
As usual they are terrified [on the whole] to attack the large homophobic bigots that Islam is absolutely full of. Or the many African leaders who are trying to take their countries backwards.
But then again we can’t expect any more from this bunch of post-modern cultural apologist cowards that call themselves anti-fascists or anti-racists!

A bit more on the BNP in regards to the EDL news

Yesterday while everyone was watching Robinson, Carroll and Quilliam. I was watching Nick Griffin.

Several times I have stated that Griffin is insanely jealous of the EDL. He craves to be that kind of figure head, leading an army of 'angry white men'.

Since the EDL formed he has bounced back and forward from ridiculing them and calling them 'Zionist puppets' to holding out the olive branch in the hope of a merger.

It costs nothing to be a member of the EDL; there is no membership. Thousands of angry men 'thinking' they are taking affirmative action against radical Islam and paying nobody for the privilege. Griffin has been spitting feathers since their inception and all the money he could have made.

I've already said that Griffin will emulate the EDL next year. At the moment he is an MEP. This will come to an end next June. With the office of MEP and being a political party he has to operate within legal, moral and ethical parameters. Next year he will no longer have this restriction. He has realised that as politics go he and his fringe party are finished.

Bring on phase 2.Back to the days of street protests.

When he first started out he was National front. He was actually largely responsible for taking the protesters of the streets and getting them involved in politics.

He thought he could gain power and influence that way. That's all been for nothing. His party is virtually gone.

I think he will go back to the old days of marching and trying to provoke this race war he spends hours dreaming off.

He genuinely believes that this war is coming and he will carried aloft by the downtrodden 'white people of Britain' to save them in their hour of need. Lunatic!

He has tried to organise some street demos but they have been quite pathetic in their numbers. Like-minded People have had the EDL to march behind and he's ended up being stood on the sidelines, watching, fuming and thinking what may have been.

Even after the evil murder of Lee Rigby, Griffin couldn't summon up more than a few people. He tried to get people up for a march [with him at the front of a motorcade saluting and waving to his legion of admirers] but to no avail. A couple of dozen acolytes ended up showing up as he laid a wreath.

In comparison the EDL had mass protests all over Britain!

So will the EDL stay as it is or will it fracture into regional units? I think Griffin would prefer it broke up. He has already forged alliances with such EDL factions as the 'North West infidels' and the 'English volunteer Force'. He will be hoping to do the same again with any newly formed extremist groups.

If the EDL does remain as a national protest group he will desperately try to forge alliances with the new leadership. Of course this all depends who and if, anyone takes over?

Ironically the one thing that stopped Griffin and Co getting their dirty hands on the EDL was Robinson and Carroll. They would have nothing to do with him. Well now they have gone and just watch this space.

What now for Tommy Robinson?

Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll have left the EDL. SO’ what now?

I’m not privy to any information about the whys and wherefore about how this happened [despite the timing of my post on Monday; purely coincidental] but all I can say is ‘if they are genuine’ good luck to them. They are working with the forward thinking ‘Quilliam foundation’ that will mentor and guide them on another path.  After all who better to guide someone away from an extremist organisation than someone who were once themselves members of extremist organisations?

I watched Robinson on ‘Newsnight’ and thought he came over well. But’ I didn't like what he said about halting Muslim immigration. That’s the last thing we should be doing. We need to continue welcoming refugees and asylum seekers from anywhere, but we must insist that they leave their cultural baggage where they fled from.
By this I mean archaic customs such as Sharia law, Forced marriages, FGM and other such Stone Age practices, that we in the west 'should' find abhorrent.
We need to get past culture. It’s about acting as 21^st century human beings. The only question immigrants need to answer.
Do you want to live in a secular, free, equal and modern society?

 

So now it all depends what Tommy Robinson’s politics are as in how he casts of his past?
If he joined Labour his past would be forgiven overnight. EX BNP and NF members appear to have become extremely clean by supporting them? They can even write books about the violence they participated in towards black and Asian people. But because they have adopted and embraced the post-modern cultural apologist mantra of unrestricted multiculturalism they are clean.
The left never expose ex far-right people in the ranks of Labour, but will use them joining another party to attack it. After all Anti-fascist organisations are strongly linked to the unions and the Labour party. That’s a fact.

Whilst in the BNP I saw how these organisations worked. They undoubtedly do parties like the BNP harm but first and foremost they are political. I've already mentioned that the Tories and liberals treat me [on the whole] well. The bile and hate that comes from Labour and their political partners has to be seen to be believed.
I still get some now just walking down the street by some antifascist Muppet who doesn't know I quit, and I’m only know in my town. Robinson and Carroll have national recognition.

The antifascists leaflet on behalf of the unions and Labour. After all, its Labour votes that the BNP was taking, because it was the working classes that had been let down by Labour. None of the other parties ever put third part leaflets out against the BNP. They tended to take on the BNP directly. The way it should be done.   

The antifascists need an enemy. It was mentioned in the Quilliam press conference that Robinson may be setting up a new political party. If he is a threat to Labour votes he will find himself back under the antifascists radar, and if he even mentions immigration or any questions to do with Islam, again  he will find himself back in the spotlight as a fascist.

There is nothing wrong with having these conversations but we are, and need to be very cautious about who is having them and why?
That is not a veiled word of caution about Robinson. That should apply to anyone. It’s not about the conversations and questions we should be having.  It’s about the agenda behind them.

Also’ Just a word on Griffin! I mentioned in the previous post that Griffin loses his seat next year. No more money, very few members.
I said he would move more to the EDL strategy of street protests. Well I think he may have been forced to move his grand plan forward after Tommie’s resignation. He is falling over himself on all social media to get as many EDL over to him as possible.
Some will no doubt go over to the BNP. But many will go the same way as the BNP when it fractured a few years ago. Lots of little wannabes setting up different groups, fighting each other for supremacy.

Am I left wing or right wing? Help me someone.

I wrote this a few weeks ago and seeing as how Mehdi Hasan has declared war on the daily mail, and they in return, on him; I thought this would be as good a time as any to put on my blog.

There is a mind-set that you have to be in one political camp or another. You have to be right or left wing. Most people are neither but in many cases the politicians, policy makers and people who have real influence on society are. Quite often the worst offenders are the political activists both online and in the real world.

If your right wing you have to have a go at ‘liberal democracy and ‘woolly minded liberals’ [Their words, not mine]

If your left wing you have to arrogantly look down your nose at anyone that doesn't believe in a bloated state and public sector.

This mind-set even tries to dictate which newspapers you should read.

If your right wing you have to despise the guardian and dismiss everything that’s in it as PC, Britain hating, claptrap, and that these people can’t get out of bed in the morning because of a lack of a backbone.

Likewise if your left wing you have to sneer constantly at anyone that reads the daily mail. Dismissing them all as nutters, racists and closet Nazis!

Well here’s a question. What if you read both papers online [and many others]several times a week [I wouldn't buy them because I don’t want to help them peddle some of their rubbish, plus I quite often have to Google a DM story to see if its true, recent or even relevant]

So does what I read make me a lefty, pc, woolly liberal, Britain hating, patriotic Nazi, racist, bigot?

Wow what would one of them look like?

For some reason to be a ‘socially conscious nice human being’ you have to attack papers such as the DM as often as possible. If you don’t well obviously you’re a right wing nut-job.

Similarly the Guardian; according to the right wing ‘Is read by lentil eating, humus smelling goat breeders who drive Citroen 2CVs and live in their own hair’.

So ‘my argument is this. How on earth can you get a realistic perspective on life if your information comes from one socio-political base?

No newspaper is totally bad. If you only ever read the daily mail ‘god help you’.

It must be hard to get out of your bed in the morning because of all the Muslim terrorists, African rapists and Romanian muggers hiding behind your bins. That’s assuming you have a bin because of all the unemployed scroungers and refugee’s that may have stolen it!

Likewise’ If you read nothing but the Guardian.  Again ‘god help you’. You must believe that Britain is responsible for all the worlds’ ills and terrorists are just misunderstood freedom fighters and there’s a government conspiracy behind everything.

Sometimes the very reason a newspaper runs a story is to prop up its political bias. But if the story is true it doesn't matter who publishes it. It’s still true.